ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Reinforcement Learning-Based Framework for Tariff-Aware Load Shifting in Energy-Intensive Manufacturing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimizing energy-intensive manufacturing under time-varying electricity tariffs requires scheduling strategies that reduce cost without compromising operational feasibility. This study is grounded in readily available industrial sensing: we exclusively use time-series measurements of aggregated active power and energy at the main distribution board of a quicklime production plant. We propose a tariff-aware load-shifting framework in which a Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) reinforcement learning agent is trained in a custom Gymnasium environment to apply discrete consumption scaling actions constrained to 80-125% of a baseline profile during the operating shift (08:00-16:00), explicitly accounting for demand-charge exposure in the TOU peak window (13:00-15:00). The reward design combines instantaneous electricity cost with cumulative energy-tracking penalties and terms associated with operational constraints. Multi-day validation over N=30 working days shows consistent economic benefits, with a median total cost reduction on the order of 10% (narrow IQR) driven by reduced peak-window energy and demand peaks. However, the script-based binary compliance indicators (viol_energy, viol_prod_min) reveal deviations from the energy-balance criterion and occasional minimum-production shortfalls under the tolerances used, highlighting the cost-production trade-off and the need for stricter constraint handling for industrial deployment. In addition, we benchmark against dynamic programming (DP), an alternative RL policy (DQN), and a greedy heuristic (GREEDY), comparing cost; operational performance; and, when applicable, computational efficiency, which positions PPO as a competitive alternative among the considered methods. Overall, this work demonstrates how learning-based decision making can be coupled with real-world industrial sensing infrastructures, providing a data-driven tariff-aware scheduling layer for industrial energy management under practical constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.