ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Age-Related Differences in Cognitive and Postural Performance During Dynamic Dual-Tasks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Age-related declines in balance and cognitive function increase fall risk and reduce quality of life in older adults and people with neurological disorders. Studying these changes in unimpaired adults provides a normative reference for identifying pathological deviations. However, most dual-task studies focus on single cognitive tasks and static conditions, specifically during gait, limiting understanding of how cognitive demand interacts with postural control while standing and during dynamic challenges. This study identified cognitive and motor outcomes most sensitive to age-related differences during motor-cognitive dual tasks of varying complexity across static and dynamic balance conditions, accounting for minimal detectable change. Sixty healthy adults performed dual-tasks ranging from simple motor activities to complex cognitive challenges (Stroop Test) while standing on a robotic platform. Cognitive performance (reaction time) and balance outcomes, including trunk and center of pressure (CoP) sway area, were assessed. Reaction time was sensitive to aging, with standardized estimates ranging from 0.014 to 0.036. The highest values occurred in the most demanding dual-task condition, enabling detection of meaningful change over short timeframes. Age effects on balance were modest under static conditions but amplified during dynamic perturbations across all dual tasks. In the SCWT 3 condition, standardized estimates for CoP sway area increased from 0.006 in the static condition to 0.047 in the passive condition, reflecting an approximately eightfold increase in age sensitivity. Trunk sway primarily reflected cognitive load, whereas CoP sway was most sensitive to balance perturbations and exceeded minimal detectable thresholds over only a couple of years. These findings support sensitive task-condition combinations for early detection and monitoring of age-related cognitive and balance decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.