ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Millimeter-Wave Body-Centric Radar Sensing for Continuous Monitoring of Human Gait Dynamics.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gait is a sensitive marker of mobility decline and fall risk, motivating unobtrusive sensing methods that can extract spatiotemporal parameters outside specialized gait laboratories. This paper presents a physics-based comparison of two millimeter-wave frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar deployment paradigms using a low-cost, system-on-chip (SoC) 60 GHz Infineon BGT60TR13C radar sensor: (i) a fixed (tripod-mounted) corridor observer and (ii) a shoe-mounted body-centric configuration attached to the medial side of the left shoe. Four healthy adult author-participants performed repeated 30 s corridor trials under five gait styles (regular, slow, fast, simulated festination, and simulated freezing-of-gait), including brief pauses during turns; an empty-corridor recording was acquired to characterize static clutter. Step events were detected using peak-picking on foot-related velocity envelopes with adaptive thresholds, and step count, cadence, step time, and step-time variability were derived. Performance of the fixed and shoe-mounted configurations was quantitatively compared to video ground truth using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for step count estimation. Across all gait styles, the shoe-mounted FMCW radar consistently reduced step-count error relative to the fixed corridor-mounted configuration, with the largest gains under irregular patterns (e.g., festination: 37.1% fixed vs. 9.6% shoe-mounted). These findings highlight the advantages of body-centric millimeter-wave radar sensing and support low-cost SoC radar as a pathway toward wearable, privacy-preserving gait monitoring in real-world environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.