ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Vision-Based Vehicle State and Behavior Analysis for Aircraft Stand Safety.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the continuous elevation of aviation safety standards, accurate monitoring of ground support vehicles in aircraft stand areas has become a critical task for enhancing overall aircraft stand operational safety. Given the limitations of existing surface movement radar and multi-camera surveillance systems in terms of cost, deployment complexity, and coverage, this paper proposes a lightweight vision-based framework for vehicle state perception and spatiotemporal behavior analysis oriented toward aircraft stand safety. Leveraging existing fixed monocular monitoring resources in the stand area, the framework first establishes a precise mapping from image pixel coordinates to the physical plane through self-calibration and homography transformation utilizing scene line features, thereby achieving unified spatial measurement of vehicle targets. Subsequently, it integrates an improved lightweight YOLO detector (incorporating Ghost modules and CBAM for noise suppression) with the ByteTrack tracking algorithm to enable stable extraction of vehicle trajectories under complex occlusion conditions. Finally, by combining functional zone division within the stand, a semantic map is constructed, and a behavior analysis method based on a spatiotemporal finite state machine is proposed. This method performs joint reasoning by fusing multi-dimensional constraints including position, zone, and time, enabling automatic detection of abnormal behaviors such as "intrusion into restricted areas" and "abnormal stop." Quantitative evaluations demonstrate the framework's efficacy: it achieves an average physical localization error (RMSE) of 0.32 m, and the improved detection model reaches an accuracy (mAP@50) of 90.4% for ground support vehicles. In tests simulating typical violation scenarios, the system achieved high recall (96.0%) and precision (95.8%) rates in detecting 'area intrusion' and 'abnormal stop' violations, respectively. These results, achieved using only existing surveillance cameras, validate its potential as a cost-effective and easily deployable tool to augment existing safety monitoring systems for airport ground operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.