ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Recognition Task-Based Detection Score: A Task-Oriented Evaluation Metric for Infrared Image Colorization.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infrared image colorization has gained widespread attention in recent years as an important means of enhancing image visibility and semantic expression. However, existing evaluation methods mostly rely on pixel-level differences or feature distribution distances, failing to comprehensively reflect the usability of colorization results in practical tasks. To address this, we propose a task-oriented colorization quality evaluation metric called Recognition-Task based Detection Score (RDS), which uses the recognition accuracy of object detection models on colorized images as a proxy indicator to measure their actual performance in downstream tasks, thereby achieving consistency between image quality assessment and task performance. RDS incorporates three key characteristics in its design: enhancing position robustness through the matching mechanism of object detection tasks, providing fine-grained interpretability through category-level accuracy calculation, and achieving task adjustability through flexible category division strategies. Systematic experiments conducted on both NIR-RGB and FLIR-5C datasets demonstrate that RDS maintains good subjective-objective consistency with traditional metrics under standard registration conditions, exhibits superior stability under registration error scenarios, and possesses fine-grained interpretability and task adjustability that traditional metrics lack. RDS maintains a 5.7% improvement in discriminative Score Gap under misalignment while PSNR degrades by 69.8%, and flexible category merging raises TIC-CGAN's RDS from 76.05% to 96.45% on unseen scenes, providing more practically valuable criteria for the evaluation and optimization of infrared colorization models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.