Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41901945›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

2D-to-3D Image Reconstruction in Agriculture: A Review of Methods, Challenges, and AI-Driven Opportunities.

Hemanth Reddy Sankaramaddi, Won Suk Lee, Kyoungchul Kim, Youngki Hong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hemanth Reddy SankaramaddiDepartment of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-2998-9944
Won Suk LeeDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9420-4789
Kyoungchul KimNational Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Jeonju 54874, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6699-881X
Youngki HongNational Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Jeonju 54874, Republic of Korea.

Funding

National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea Project number: PJ01771501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agriculture is rapidly becoming a data-driven field where automation relies on transforming 2D images into accurate 3D models. However, selecting the most effective method remains challenging due to the unconstrained nature of the environment. This review assesses the effectiveness of geometry-based, sensor-based, and learning-based reconstruction methodologies in agricultural settings. We analyze photogrammetric pipelines, active sensing, and neural rendering methods based on their geometric accuracy, data processing speed, and field performance against wind or occlusion. Our analysis indicates that while Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is highly accurate, it is too expensive for widespread adoption. Conversely, geometry-based methods are inexpensive but struggle with complex biological structures. Learning-based methods, especially 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS), have revolutionized the field by enabling a balance between visual fidelity and real-time inference speed. We conclude that the best chance for scalability and accuracy lies in hybrid pipelines that integrate Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) with geometric priors. We believe that "hybrid intelligence" systems, such as edge-native 3D Gaussian Splatting combined with semantic priors, are the future of 3D reconstruction. These systems will enable the creation of real-time, spatiotemporal (4D) digital twins that drive automated decision-making in precision agriculture.

Indexed as

3D gaussian splatting (3DGS)computer visiondeep learningLiDARneural radiance fields (NeRF)plant phenotypingprecision agriculture

Identifiers

PMID41901945
PMCPMC13030611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.