ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
On the Use of a Depth Camera for the Assessment of Upper Extremity Movements in Healthy Individuals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper extremity impairments often lead to reduced joint range of motion (ROM), making reliable assessment essential for rehabilitation planning. This study investigated the within-day and between-day reliability of the Microsoft Kinect V2 depth camera for active upper extremity ROM assessment in 30 healthy adults. Ten predefined shoulder and elbow movements were recorded, and joint angles were computed using a custom vector-based algorithm. Within-day reliability ranged from moderate to excellent (ICC: 0.754-0.953), while between-day reliability ranged from moderate to good (ICC: 0.654-0.881). Absolute reliability varies substantially across movements. The SEM% values ranged from 2.1% to 17.3% within-day and from 2.8% to 23.6% between-day. The between-day MDC values were particularly high for certain movements (e.g., >20° for shoulder extension and >50° for elbow flexion), indicating limited sensitivity to detect small clinical changes. Additionally, shoulder adduction could not be reliably analyzed in 36.7% of participants due to self-occlusion-related tracking instability, highlighting a practical limitation of the Kinect V2 for certain upper extremity movements. These findings suggest that Kinect V2-based ROM assessment demonstrates acceptable reliability for large-amplitude planar movements under controlled conditions but shows substantial limitations for rotational and occlusion-prone tasks. The device may be suitable for research or screening applications; however, caution is warranted when interpreting small changes in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.