ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Fully Automated Deep Learning Pipeline for Anatomical Landmark Localization on Three-Dimensional Pelvic Surface Scans.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate identification of anatomical landmarks on three-dimensional (3D) pelvic surface scans is essential for musculoskeletal assessment, yet manual procedures remain limited by operator dependence and soft tissue variability. This study presents a fully automated deep learning pipeline for localizing anatomical landmarks on the posterior pelvic region from raw 3D point cloud data. The pipeline integrates three modules: PelvicROINet for extracting the region of interest, PelvicAlignNet for rotation correction to standardize posture, and PelvicLandmarkNet for localizing six anatomical landmarks including the bilateral posterior superior iliac spines, bilateral iliac crests, L1, and L4. The models were trained independently with task-specific annotations and combined sequentially during inference. Under a subject-level split evaluation setting, the fully integrated system achieved a median error of 11.25 mm, demonstrating consistent localization performance across unseen subjects. Compared with manual landmark marking, the automated measurements showed improved within-visit repeatability, with reduced variability and higher intraclass correlation coefficients. The entire inference process required approximately three seconds per scan, supporting near real-time clinical applicability. These results indicate that the proposed modular framework enhances numerical consistency and robustness in surface-based pelvic landmark assessment and provides a scalable foundation for AI-assisted musculoskeletal evaluation and longitudinal monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.