Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41901920›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Systematic Evaluation of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for IoT Malware Detection Across Ransomware, Rootkit, Spyware, Trojan, Botnet, Worm, Virus, and Keylogger.

Mazdak Maghanaki, Soraya Keramati, F Frank Chen, Mohammad Shahin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mazdak MaghanakiDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Industrial Engineering, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-2285-0175
Soraya KeramatiDepartment of Mineral, Metallurgical, and Materials Engineering, Université Laval, Québec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
F Frank ChenDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Industrial Engineering, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7638-2186
Mohammad ShahinDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-3147-739X

Funding

Lutcher Brown Distinguished Chair Professorship at The University of Texas at San Antonio The University of Texas at San AntonioU.S. Department of Defense MCS2106-23-01U.S. Department of Energy DE-NA0004003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth of Internet-of-Things (IoT) deployments has substantially expanded the attack surface of modern cyber-physical systems, making accurate and computationally feasible malware detection essential for enterprise and industrial environments. This study presents a large-scale, systematic comparison of 27 machine learning (ML) and 18 deep learning (DL) models for IoT malware detection across eight major malware categories: Trojan, Botnet, Ransomware, Rootkit, Worm, Spyware, Keylogger, and Virus. A realistic dataset was constructed using 50,000 executable samples collected from the Any.Run platform, including 8000 malware instances (1000 per class) and 42,000 benign samples. Each sample was executed in a sandbox to extract detailed static and behavioral telemetry. A targeted feature-selection pipeline reduced the feature space to 47 diagnostic features spanning static properties, behavioral indicators, process/file/registry activity, debug signals, and network telemetry, yielding a compact representation suitable for malware detection in IoT settings. Experimental results demonstrate that ensemble tree-based ML models consistently dominate performance on the engineered tabular feature set as 7 of the top 10 models are ML, with CatBoost and LightGBM achieving near-ceiling accuracy and low false-positive rates. Per-malware analysis further shows that optimal model choice depends on malware behavior. CatBoost is best for Trojan/Spyware, LightGBM for Botnet, XGBoost for Worm, Extra Trees for Rootkit, and Random Forest for Keylogger, while DL models are competitive only for specific categories, with TabNet performing best for Ransomware and FT-Transformer for Virus. In addition, an end-to-end computational time analysis across all 45 models reveals a clear efficiency advantage for boosted tree ensembles relative to most DL architectures, supporting deployment feasibility on commodity CPU hardware. Overall, the study provides actionable guidance for designing adaptive IoT malware detection frameworks, recommending gradient-boosted ensemble ML models as the primary deployment choice, with selective DL models only when category-specific gains justify additional computational cost.

Indexed as

botnetIoT cybersecuritykeyloggermalware detectionransomwarerootkitspywaretrojanvirusworm

Identifiers

PMID41901920
PMCPMC13029984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.