ArticlePolymers2026
Dynamics of Drone Blades Based on Polymer Nanocomposites Incorporating Graphene, Carbon Nanotube, and Fullerene.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymer nanocomposites offer significant potential for improving the strength-to-weight ratio and dynamic behavior of drone blades. This study examines the vibration characteristics of tapered aramid (Kevlar)/epoxy composite blades reinforced with nanocarbon fillers-graphene (2D), multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs, 1D), and fullerene (0D)-to determine the most effective filler for enhancing stiffness and operational stability. The laminated blades (300 mm length, 200 mm width, root thickness 13 mm, tip thickness 8 mm) incorporate ply drop-offs and a central honeycomb core. Modeling was performed using classical laminate plate theory integrated with the finite element method (FEM) in MATLAB (R2016a). Under clamped-free-free-free boundary conditions, the study considered rotational speeds of 750-2250 rpm, setting angles of 30-60°, various fiber orientations, and nanofiller contents of 0-10 wt.%. The results indicate that while the setting angle minimally affects natural frequency, it significantly influences damping in modes (1,2) and (2,1). Increasing nanofiller content improves stiffness, with optimal performance observed near 5 wt.%. At 1500 rpm in mode (1,1), MWCNTs provided the greatest enhancement. Overall, MWCNTs exhibited superior stiffness improvement and rotational stability compared to other fillers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.