Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41901884›Full record

ReviewPolymers2026

Polyester Resin-Quartz Composites in the Age of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twins: Current Advances, Future Perspectives and an Application Example.

Marco Suess, Peter Kurzweil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marco SuessGebrüder Dorfner GmbH & Co. KG, Scharhof 1, 92242 Hirschau, Germany.
Peter KurzweilDepartment MBUT, University of Applied Sciences (OTH) Amberg-Weiden, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Ring 23, 92224 Amberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2789-5177

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unsaturated polyester resin (UPR)-quartz composites have become increasingly important in structural, sanitary, and architectural applications. However, their manufacturing processes still rely heavily on empirical knowledge. This review compiles recent developments in materials science, curing kinetics, and digital manufacturing, outlining a pathway toward data-driven, adaptive production of quartz-filled thermosets. The chemical and physical fundamentals of UPR polymerization are summarized, including the influence of initiator systems, filler characteristics, and thermal management on network formation. Challenges associated with highly filled formulations-such as viscosity control, dispersion, shrinkage, and exothermic peak prediction-are discussed in detail. Recent advances in digital twins (DTs) and artificial intelligence (AI) are reviewed, demonstrating how physics-based simulations, machine learning models, and hybrid mechanistic-data-driven approaches improve the prediction of rheology, curing behavior, and quality outcomes in thermoset polymer processes. A practical application example demonstrates the prediction of peak time in quartz-UPR composites using Random Forest and Gradient Boosting ensemble models. Two prediction scenarios are evaluated: Scenario A with gel time by Leave-One-Out cross-validation, and Scenario B without gel time, representing post-mixing and pre-process prediction contexts, respectively. Stratified bootstrap augmentation improves Gradient Boosting in both scenarios. Principal component analysis confirms that the curing process is governed by three independent physical dimensions: curing reactivity, thermal environment and resin thermal state.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedigital twinpeak time evaluationquartz compositesunsaturated polyester resin

Identifiers

PMID41901884
PMCPMC13029889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.