ArticlePolymers2026
Static and Cyclic Mechanical Behavior of 3D-Printed PEEK Under Tensile and Compressive Loads.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) is a high-performance polymer with exceptional mechanical properties, durability and lightweight. 3D printing of PEEK can be very beneficial in the medical industry to manufacture patient-specific implants; however, there is a lack of studies regarding the fatigue behavior of 3D-printed PEEK, especially under compression, which is closely related to its potential applications. This paper investigates the static and dynamic mechanical performance of 3D-printed PEEK. Tensile and compression tests were conducted on specimens with ±45° raster orientation. Annealing at 270 °C for 5 h increased crystallinity from 34.4% to 41.4% yet unexpectedly reduced tensile strength from 60.8 MPa to 47.3 MPa, while increasing Young's modulus from 2.51 GPa to 3.51 GPa. Micro-CT analysis revealed increased pore size after annealing. Static compression strength showed improvement post-annealing, increasing from 80.1 MPa to 126.7 MPa, with modulus rising from 1.64 GPa to 2.28 GPa. Compression-compression fatigue tests, performed at 5 Hz and 2.5 Hz with stress amplitudes of 70-95% of maximum strength (R = 0.1), enabled the construction of the first S-N curve for 3D-printed PEEK under compressive loading. Annealed specimens exhibited superior fatigue life, with infinite life achieved at 83.3 MPa (70% of static strength). Thermal imaging highlighted the role of temperature in fatigue failure, showing that annealed specimens endured higher thermal loads. These findings support the suitability of 3D-printed PEEK for load-bearing biomedical applications under cyclic compressive loads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.