ArticlePolymers2026
Rheology for Wood Plastic Composite Extrusion Part 2: Process Simulation and Experimental Verification.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Wood and Wood Polymer Composites.Polymers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheological data of wood plastic composites (WPCs) are not readily present in many of the common scientific databases. For this reason, designing the processing of WPCs, e.g., extrusion, is difficult or even impossible, and it is often necessary to conduct research on your own to obtain the proper data. In the first part of the paper, studies of WPCs' rheology have been performed in laboratory and production conditions. Tests in laboratory conditions have been conducted based on High-Pressure Capillary Rheometry (HPCR), using the Melt Flow Index (MFI). Tests in production conditions (on-line) have been performed by measuring the extrusion die pressure and extrusion throughput. The MFI's viscosity and on-line viscosity results have been assessed against those of HPCR. In the second part of the paper, the viscosity data and models have been used for extrusion process simulations. Experimental studies of the process have been performed, and the experimental results have been used for evaluating the models applied. It was found that the two-point MFI method of determining viscosity and the on-line tests may be a reasonable alternative in the absence of HPCR data. The MFI method using the power-law model is fast and easy to apply and allows for analytical solutions to many processing problems. A significant advantage of on-line tests is that they are performed under real flow conditions of the tested material rather than laboratory conditions that do not take into account the material processing history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.