Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41901746›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Comparative Genome Analysis of Illumina, Nanopore, and Hybrid Approaches: A Case Study of the Aquaculture Isolate 160P.

Izzet Burcin Saticioglu, Janset Bozkurt, Muhammed Duman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Izzet Burcin SaticiogluDepartment of Aquatic Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, 16059 Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-2721-3204
Janset BozkurtDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Bursa Uludag University, 16059 Bursa, Türkiye.
Muhammed DumanDepartment of Aquatic Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, 16059 Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7707-2705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we comparatively assessed short-read (Illumina), long-read (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, ONT), and hybrid (Illumina + ONT) sequencing strategies for bacterial genome analysis using the aquaculture-derived isolate 160P. Genomic DNA was extracted and sequenced on Illumina paired-end and ONT long-read platforms, and de novo assemblies were generated using SPAdes, Canu, Flye, and Unicycler under short-read-only, long-read-only, and hybrid workflows, followed by evaluation with QUAST assembly metrics. Among the tested approaches, the hybrid Unicycler assembly provided the highest contiguity, yielding seven contigs and a dominant 4.55 Mb contig consistent with near-complete chromosomal representation. Downstream analyses included functional genome annotation and in silico screening of antimicrobial resistance determinants (CARD), virulence-associated genes (VFDB), and secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters (antiSMASH). Comparative genomic relatedness based on Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) and digital DNA-DNA Hybridization (dDDH) indicated that 160P is most closely related to

Indexed as

AeromonasGenome, BacterialGenomicsAnimalsAquacultureHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNanoporesNanopore SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAAeromonashybrid genome assemblyOxford Nanopore Technologies

Identifiers

PMID41901746
PMCPMC13028912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.