ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2026
Unnecessary ERCPs: Is Spontaneous Stone Passage the Sole Determinant?
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the cornerstone in the management of choledocholithiasis. Despite continuous advancements in technique and safety, ERCP carries a risk of significant complications, underscoring the importance of avoiding unnecessary procedures. The principal contributor to potentially avoidable ERCPs in patients with known choledocholithiasis is the spontaneous passage of common bile duct stones. Small stone size and a long interval between diagnosis and the procedure have increasingly been found to favor this event. Moreover, despite the development of well-defined risk stratification scores for patients with suspected choledocholithiasis, the incidence of negative ERCPs within this patient population remains considerable, even when a high suspicion of choledocholithiasis is evident. This review summarizes current evidence on the incidence and predictors of avoidable ERCPs in these contexts, with particular emphasis on spontaneous stone passage. It also discusses the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) as a diagnostic tool to reduce unnecessary procedures when initial imaging fails to confirm the presence of stones despite persistent high clinical suspicion. By integrating and critically appraising recent findings, we provide practical guidance for clinicians on decision-making regarding ERCP, particularly in situations where spontaneous stone passage is likely or imaging results are inconclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.