Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41901437›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Overlooked Impact of Botanical Pesticides on Non-Target Organisms.

Ana Paula Soares, Guilherme Julião Zocolo, Adeney de Freitas Bueno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ana Paula SoaresPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Centro Politécnico, Setor de Ciências Biológicas, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba 81531-980, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6026-9672
Guilherme Julião ZocoloPrograma de Pós-Graduação, Londrina State University (UEL), P.O. Box 10011, Londrina 86057-970, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8835-0184
Adeney de Freitas BuenoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Centro Politécnico, Setor de Ciências Biológicas, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba 81531-980, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5462-5845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To better understand how botanical products affect non-target organisms, the present review focuses on the toxicity of botanical pesticides to organisms other than targeted pests, to trace a panorama on the future of sustainable agricultural models worldwide, considering the importance of ecotoxicological studies in the development of new pesticides, including botanical kinds, which are commonly recognized as essentially harmless. The review summarizes published work gathered from digital databases and highlights modern trends in pest management research and the development of novel bioinputs, including a discussion of the world's current legislation regarding relevant agricultural innovations and field obstacles. Nanotechnology techniques are discussed as major innovations employed in the pest control field, and their employment in improving botanical pesticides is addressed and explored. In this work, we analyze the factors involved in determining the success of botanical products and their importance in the implementation of a more sustainable approach to managing crops. The results indicate a significant lack of studies focused on the effects of botanical products on non-target organisms and an increase in studies with nanoformulations.

Indexed as

bioinputsecotoxicologyessential oilsnanotechnologyplant-derived compoundsrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID41901437
PMCPMC13030757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.