ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Neoantigen-Encoded Oncolytic Viruses as Personalized Cancer Vaccines.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Neoantigen vaccines have revitalized cancer vaccination by targeting tumor-specific mutant epitopes largely absent from central tolerance. Yet, clinical benefits remain inconsistent, in part because conventional vaccine platforms often do not reliably deliver antigens within an inflammatory tumor context, struggle to overcome immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments, and may not rapidly adapt to tumor heterogeneity and evolution. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) provide a mechanistically distinct route to "vaccinate in situ" by coupling tumor-selective infection and immunogenic cancer cell death with local innate immune activation, antigen release, and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment. In parallel, advances in sequencing, neoantigen prediction (e.g., updated NetMHCpan and MHCflurry tools as of 2025), and antigen presentation validation have enabled rational selection of patient-specific targets. At the same time, modern OV engineering supports insertion of neoantigen payloads and immune-modulatory transgenes. Here, we summarized principles that underpin neoantigen-encoded OVs as personalized cancer vaccines, emphasizing how OV adjuvanticity and antigenicity interact to drive priming, epitope spreading, and durable systemic immunity. We discussed major OV platforms with respect to payload capacity, expression control, manufacturability, and clinical track records, including lessons learned from approved or late-stage OVs such as talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) and teserpaturev/G47Δ. We also discussed design choices for encoding neoantigens (polyepitope strings, minigenes, long peptides; class I/II balancing), prioritizing translational biomarkers and immune-monitoring strategies, and outlining regulatory and GMP considerations for "platform-plus-variable insert" products. Finally, we propose a pragmatic clinical workflow for rapid personalization to maximize therapeutic index. Tightly integrating neoantigen science with immunovirotherapy, including recent 2025 preclinical advances like oncolytic adenovirus neoantigen delivery sensitizing low-TMB tumors to PD-1 blockade, could enable next-generation personalized cancer vaccines capable of converting "cold" tumors into responsive, systemically controlled disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.