ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Quantitative Comparison of Medial and Coronal Dentate Gyrus Microdissection Strategies and a Softening-Based Workflow for Reproducible Tissue Procurement.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A reliable isolation of the dentate gyrus (DG) is a critical pre-analytical step for region-specific neurobiological assays, yet DG microdissection practices vary widely and are rarely compared quantitatively under standardized conditions. In addition, long-term paraformaldehyde-fixed archival brain tissue is commonly regarded as unsuitable for microdissection because of reduced pliability and poor anatomical contrast, limiting its use for training and protocol development. Here, we quantitatively compare two commonly used DG microdissection strategies, a medial (intact-block) approach and a coronal (slice-guided) approach across fresh, fixed, and softened-fixed rat brain hemispheres under matched conditions. To enable the use of archival material, fixed hemispheres were subjected to a simple 15-day slow-running tap water softening protocol to improve tissue handling and landmark visibility. Dissection duration and anatomical specificity were evaluated, the latter quantified by measuring residual cornu ammonis (CA)1-3 area on hematoxylin-eosin-stained coronal sections following DG removal. In fresh tissue, the medial approach enabled significantly faster DG isolation than the coronal approach, while both strategies achieved comparable anatomical specificity. In softened-fixed tissue, dissection times increased for both approaches, but the same relative performance ranking was preserved. Softening markedly improved tissue pliability and boundary visualization, particularly benefiting the coronal, stepwise dissection strategy. Residual CA1-3 areas did not differ significantly between approaches or tissue states. This study provides a validated, training-oriented DG microdissection workflow that supports methodological standardization, reproducibility, and 3R-aligned use of archival tissue, strengthening the pre-analytical foundation for downstream region-specific neuroscience assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.