ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Where Do We Stand?
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular imaging is essential in the diagnosis, phenotyping and prognostic assessment of cardiovascular disease. However, longstanding limitations constrain the accuracy, throughput, and scalability of cardiovascular imaging techniques. Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated a diverse range of potential benefits across modalities, including echocardiography, computerised tomography, nuclear imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging. These benefits include automated quantification of key heart parameters, ability to improve traditional disease detection and phenotyping, and image reconstruction. While the use of AI in clinical workflows is still largely emerging, its significance is becoming established through numerous promising studies. The evidence reviewed indicates that AI can meaningfully enhance disease management, clinical operations and patient experience when used alongside physician expertise. However, several challenges restrict the widespread clinical implementation of AI, including a lack of robust prospective evidence, regulatory hurdles, bias in training datasets, and ethical drawbacks such as data privacy and accountability. Future developments should prioritise large-scale prospective and multicentre validation and address practical and ethical barriers to ensure AI can be utilised safely and effectively in clinical settings. This narrative review comprehensively analyses advances in AI-driven cardiovascular imaging with a focus on clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.