Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41901026›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Where Do We Stand?

Archit A Singhal, Tiffany Bowyer-Howell, Nikant Sabharwal, Andrew Lewis, Andrew R J Mitchell, Oliver Rider, John A Henry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Archit A SinghalOxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Tiffany Bowyer-HowellUniversity of Oxford Medical School, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Nikant SabharwalOxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1989-947X
Andrew LewisOxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Andrew R J MitchellDepartment of Cardiology, Jersey General Hospital, Gloucester Street, St. Helier JE1 3QS, Jersey.ORCID 0000-0002-5386-9645
Oliver RiderOxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
John A HenryOxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7650-0963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular imaging is essential in the diagnosis, phenotyping and prognostic assessment of cardiovascular disease. However, longstanding limitations constrain the accuracy, throughput, and scalability of cardiovascular imaging techniques. Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated a diverse range of potential benefits across modalities, including echocardiography, computerised tomography, nuclear imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging. These benefits include automated quantification of key heart parameters, ability to improve traditional disease detection and phenotyping, and image reconstruction. While the use of AI in clinical workflows is still largely emerging, its significance is becoming established through numerous promising studies. The evidence reviewed indicates that AI can meaningfully enhance disease management, clinical operations and patient experience when used alongside physician expertise. However, several challenges restrict the widespread clinical implementation of AI, including a lack of robust prospective evidence, regulatory hurdles, bias in training datasets, and ethical drawbacks such as data privacy and accountability. Future developments should prioritise large-scale prospective and multicentre validation and address practical and ethical barriers to ensure AI can be utilised safely and effectively in clinical settings. This narrative review comprehensively analyses advances in AI-driven cardiovascular imaging with a focus on clinical implementation.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiac magnetic resonance imagingcardiovascular imagingcomputerised tomographyechocardiographynuclear cardiology

Identifiers

PMID41901026
PMCPMC13027889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.