ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Comparative Cancer Genetics and Veterinary Therapeutics in Dogs and Cats: A Species-Aware Framework for Comparative Oncology.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- What Does Bacteria Have to Do with Cancer? The Influence of the Body's Microbiota on Cancer in Cats and Dogs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Serum untargeted metabolomics reveals key pathways in feline mammary carcinoma for comparative oncology.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide, affecting not only humans but also companion animals such as dogs and cats. Although traditional rodent models have long served as the foundation of preclinical oncology research, their limited ability to replicate the complexity of spontaneous human cancers has driven interest in comparative oncology. Dogs and cats develop naturally occurring tumors that closely resemble human malignancies in histopathology, molecular alterations, tumor microenvironments, and treatment response. These species also share exposure to environmental carcinogens and demonstrate conserved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profiles of several chemotherapeutic agents. This review provides a comprehensive comparison of cancer epidemiology, tumor biology, pharmacologic treatment modalities, drug formulation challenges, and regulatory considerations in humans, dogs, and cats. Key molecular targets such as TP53, HER2, EGFR, and PD-L1 exhibit cross-species conservation, supporting the relevance of companion animals in biomarker discovery and drug screening. However, interspecies differences in drug metabolism, enzyme expression (e.g., CYP450), and drug tolerability underscore the importance of species-specific dosing strategies and therapeutic drug monitoring. Advanced delivery platforms-including liposomes, nanoparticles, and antibody-drug conjugates-have also been successfully translated into veterinary oncology. Comparative analyses across humans and companion animals may inform biomarker prioritization, PK/PD modeling, and formulation design; however, species-specific differences require cautious interpretation and veterinary-centered dosing and safety considerations. Companion animals serve not only as valuable models for cancer research but also as direct beneficiaries of precision oncology. Future work should prioritize harmonized veterinary trial designs and improved cross-species data standards, with translational applications considered as a downstream benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.