Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41900948›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Comparative Cancer Genetics and Veterinary Therapeutics in Dogs and Cats: A Species-Aware Framework for Comparative Oncology.

Sangjin Ahn, Jang-Hyuk Yun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sangjin AhnCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1821-6101
Jang-Hyuk YunCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7645-9721

Funding

the National Institute of Wildlife Disease Control and Prevention Specialized Graduate School Support Project for Wildlife Disease Specialists
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide, affecting not only humans but also companion animals such as dogs and cats. Although traditional rodent models have long served as the foundation of preclinical oncology research, their limited ability to replicate the complexity of spontaneous human cancers has driven interest in comparative oncology. Dogs and cats develop naturally occurring tumors that closely resemble human malignancies in histopathology, molecular alterations, tumor microenvironments, and treatment response. These species also share exposure to environmental carcinogens and demonstrate conserved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profiles of several chemotherapeutic agents. This review provides a comprehensive comparison of cancer epidemiology, tumor biology, pharmacologic treatment modalities, drug formulation challenges, and regulatory considerations in humans, dogs, and cats. Key molecular targets such as TP53, HER2, EGFR, and PD-L1 exhibit cross-species conservation, supporting the relevance of companion animals in biomarker discovery and drug screening. However, interspecies differences in drug metabolism, enzyme expression (e.g., CYP450), and drug tolerability underscore the importance of species-specific dosing strategies and therapeutic drug monitoring. Advanced delivery platforms-including liposomes, nanoparticles, and antibody-drug conjugates-have also been successfully translated into veterinary oncology. Comparative analyses across humans and companion animals may inform biomarker prioritization, PK/PD modeling, and formulation design; however, species-specific differences require cautious interpretation and veterinary-centered dosing and safety considerations. Companion animals serve not only as valuable models for cancer research but also as direct beneficiaries of precision oncology. Future work should prioritize harmonized veterinary trial designs and improved cross-species data standards, with translational applications considered as a downstream benefit.

Indexed as

anticancer therapycompanion animalscomparative oncologydrug delivery systemsimmunotherapynanoparticlespharmacokineticsprecision medicinespontaneous tumorstranslational pharmaceutics

Identifiers

PMID41900948
PMCPMC13027462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.