Metabolic and Reproductive Responses to Peripartum Feed Supplementation in Hyperprolific Gilts.

Julia Cantin, Carlos Cantin, Olga Mitjana, Maria Teresa Tejedor, Carlos Gil-Rubio, Ana Maria Garrido, Maria Victoria Falceto

Abstract read

PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher

In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia CantinDepartment of Animal Pathology, University of Zaragoza, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.

Carlos CantinIndependent Researcher, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.

Olga MitjanaDepartment of Animal Pathology, University of Zaragoza, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9907-2941

Maria Teresa TejedorDepartment of Anatomy, Embryology and Animal Genetics, CIBERV, University of Zaragoza, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5026-5144

Carlos Gil-RubioVeterinary Technical Service Nutega, CCPA Group, 28823 Coslada, Spain.

Ana Maria GarridoDepartment of Animal Pathology, University of Zaragoza, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.

Maria Victoria FalcetoDepartment of Animal Pathology, University of Zaragoza, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.

Funding

NUTEGA CCPA group was funded the analysis of the diets and materials used to measure the metabolic status of the animals. no one

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gilts have a lower capacity for voluntary feed intake and body reserves than multiparous sows, which limits their ability to cope with the needs of gestation and lactation. In this study, a nutritional supplement was formulated to support gilts during the peripartum period. Both control (C, n = 64) and treatment (T, n = 63) groups received standard commercial diets. Group T received 300gr of supplement per gilt and day for the last 35 days of gestation until the fifth day of lactation. This supplement contained calcium (Ca; 4.1%), sodium (Na; 4.0%), lysine (Lys; 1.96%), methionine (Met; 1.32%), vitamin B

Indexed as

feed supplementationgiltsmetabolismperipartumreproduction

Identifiers

PMID41900934

DOI10.3390/life16030416

PMCPMC13027912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.