Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41900909›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Frontal-to-Parietal Theta Interactions Mediate Tactile Decision-Making.

Pritom Mukherjee, Sydney Apraku, Mukesh Dhamala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pritom MukherjeeDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Sydney AprakuDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Mukesh DhamalaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9426-6261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision-making relies on coordinated neural dynamics that integrate sensory evidence with top-down control. In this EEG study, we examined sensor (scalp)-level theta and alpha-band oscillations, as well as fronto-parietal network connectivity, during a tactile spatial discrimination task. Blindfolded participants judged the lateral offset of the central dot in a three-dot array delivered to the right index finger while an EEG was recorded. Time-frequency analyses revealed that both theta and alpha power were greater for correct than incorrect decision trials during pre-stimulus and post-stimulus intervals, suggesting enhanced preparatory and mnemonic engagement during accurate decisions. Directional connectivity assessed using block (multivariate) Granger causality demonstrated significantly stronger frontal-to-parietal influence in the theta band during both pre- and post-stimulus periods for correct decisions, supporting the role of long-range theta communication for top-down control in guiding tactile judgment. These findings highlight theta-band fronto-parietal communication as a key mechanism supporting successful tactile decision-making.

Indexed as

alpha oscillationsdecision-makingfronto-parietal networktactile stimulitheta oscillations

Identifiers

PMID41900909
PMCPMC13028363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.