ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Carbonation Depth Prediction in Concrete.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polypyrrole/Graphene/WOPolymers · 2026Article
- Parametric modeling of random polygonal aggregates in concrete and nusssmerical simulation of uniaxial compression using SPH.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The durability of reinforced concrete structures is significantly affected by the carbonation process, which decreases the alkalinity of the pore solution and initiates corrosion of the steel reinforcement. However, the square roots of time equations, which are Fickian diffusion-based, are not able to accurately capture the nonlinear interactions of material properties with environmental factors. To overcome this limitation, this research introduces a novel hybrid model based on the integration of a physics-informed neural network (PINN) with residual regression via CatBoost, a categorical boosting algorithm. Using an expanded dataset of 6000 samples, the first stage of the model, which is based on the physics-informed neural network, is able to learn the underlying physics of the diffusion process by imposing monotonicity constraints. The second stage of the model, which is based on the CatBoost algorithm, is able to learn the residuals of the nonlinear interactions of factors such as the curing time, water-cement ratio, and supplementary cementitious material reactivity, which are not captured by the underlying physics of the diffusion law. Data augmentation via physics-based resampling increased the dataset from 3000 to 6000 samples. Validation of the model using 1200 samples resulted in R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.