ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
In Situ X-Ray Imaging and Machine Learning in Ultrasonic Field-Assisted Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing: A Review.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metal additive manufacturing (AM) offers unprecedented opportunities to fabricate complex, lightweight metallic components, yet its practical deployment remains fundamentally constrained by defects arising from rapid melting and solidification. Cyclic thermal transients generate cracks, pores, residual stresses, and lack-of-fusion regions, undermining mechanical performance and reliability. Ultrasonic field-assisted laser-based additive manufacturing (UF-LBAM) has emerged as a powerful approach to manipulate melt pool dynamics and suppress defect formation. Nevertheless, the governing physical mechanisms remain poorly understood, particularly under highly non-equilibrium ultrasonic excitation, where acoustic pressure oscillations, melt convection, cavitation, and solidification are intricately coupled across multiple temporal and spatial scales. Here, we provide a systematic review of X-ray based fundamental studies in UF-LBAM and the diverse applications of machine learning (ML), detailing the literature selection criteria and methodology. We highlight advances spanning synchrotron X-ray revealed physical phenomena, ML-driven real-time monitoring and defect prediction, and pathways toward industrial implementation. Critical challenges persist, including fundamental physics gaps, transferability of ML models across alloy systems, and real-time control limitations. We further identify promising directions for the field, such as physics-informed models, multimodal diagnostics, and closed-loop control, which together promise to unlock the full potential of UF-LBAM for high-performance metal component fabrication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.