ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Layer Bond Strength in 3D-Printed Concrete: The Role of Interlayer Surface Area and Printing Delay Time.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anisotropic Behavior of 3D-Printed Concrete: Interlayer Bonding, Pore Architecture, Reinforcement Limitations, and Durability Mechanisms.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing, also known as additive manufacturing of cementitious materials, appears to be a promising way to build in a way that is more time-efficient, cost-effective and, under certain conditions, environmentally friendly. This technology continues to exhibit significant inhomogeneity, which is frequently caused by the interlayer area. The presented research aims to clarify the influence of the interlayer surface area and delay time on the bond strength. This study involved reference cast and printed samples with different delay times and cast samples with different interlayer surface areas. Different interlayer surface areas were accomplished through the utilisation of a teeth shaper before casting the second layer. Research has shown that the interlayer surface area has a significant impact on layer bond strength; up to a 70% increase in bond strength can be achieved while increasing the area by 20%. The results show that the increase in strength due to a larger surface area remained constant in terms of percentage, across delay times, with a linear dependency on a specific range of conditions. After the threshold of the surface area increased, the bond strength could be compromised and lowered. This threshold is above a 120% increase in surface area for the used teeth geometry and material. The proposed technology of ejecting teeth to alter the interlayer surface area has the potential to reduce the heterogeneity of mechanical properties in 3D-printed objects, caused by the different delay time between layers, because of the print strategy or material shortage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.