Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41900600›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Modeling the Friction Behavior of Low-Carbon Steel Sheets Using Various Machine Learning Algorithms Based on Strip Drawing Test Data.

Tomasz Trzepieciński

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tomasz TrzepiecińskiFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszów University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 8, 35-029 Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4366-0135

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of machine learning (ML) methods enables the modeling of sheet metal friction phenomena based on experimental data, allowing for the prediction of the coefficient of friction (CoF) under various operating conditions. The aim of this article is to compare the predictive capability of a wide range of ML algorithms trained on the results of the strip drawing test. The variable parameters in the strip drawing test were sheet orientation, load, sample orientation relative to the sheet rolling direction, and the drawing quality of the low-carbon steel sheet metal. Based on the coefficient of determination (R

Indexed as

coefficient of frictionfrictionsheet metal formingsteel sheets

Identifiers

PMID41900600
PMCPMC13028231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.