ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Laser Wire Directed Energy Deposition of 5356 Aluminum Alloy: Process Parameter Optimization and Porosity Prediction.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Study on the Process, Microstructure, and Properties of Laser Additive Manufacturing of Titanium Alloys.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laser wire directed energy deposition (LWDED) has garnered significant attention for the fabrication of large metallic components. However, the complex coupling effects among its process parameters pose challenges for porosity control. Optimizing parameter combinations to effectively minimize porosity is therefore critical to the broader adoption of this technology. In this study, systematic experiments and modeling were conducted to optimize the LWDED process parameters and predict porosity. First, single-factor and orthogonal experiments were performed to evaluate the individual effects of laser power, scanning speed, wire feeding speed, and air pressure on porosity. Subsequently, range analysis and analysis of variance were employed to determine the influence of each parameter and the significance of their interactions. Four machine learning models-SVR, RF, GPR, and XGBoost-were then trained and compared. Among them, the SVR model exhibited the best predictive performance, achieving an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.