ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Chloride Ion Transport in Reinforced Concrete Structures Considering the Barrier Effect of Reinforcing Steel.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A mesoscale model for chloride diffusion in reinforced concrete was established by considering the blocking effect of reinforcing steel. This model improved the accuracy of chloride concentration prediction and enhanced the reliability of durability-based service-life assessment. First, a series of chloride transport experiments under wetting-drying cycles was carried out on reinforced concrete specimens. These experiments were used to evaluate the effects of exposure condition, rebar blocking, and concrete compressive strength on chloride transport. Then, a mesoscale chloride diffusion model including the rebar-induced blocking effect was developed and validated. Finally, a sensitivity analysis of the key parameters was conducted. The results showed that, compared with concrete without longitudinal reinforcement, wetting-drying cycles had a stronger influence on reinforced concrete with longitudinal bars. The enhancing effect of wetting-drying cycles on chloride ingress was the strongest, followed by compressive strength and then the rebar-induced blocking effect, although the latter was still non-negligible. As the rebar diameter increased, the peak chloride concentration increased, and the chloride concentration around the aggregates also increased more rapidly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.