ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Integrating Finite Element Simulation with Actual GTAW Weld Profiles to Optimize Root Height in Stainless Steel 316L Pipe Joints.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Weld root reinforcement is a critical geometric parameter governing stress concentration and structural performance in thin-walled stainless-steel piping systems designed to ASME B31.3. While current codes specify permissible dimensional limits, they do not explicitly quantify how incremental variations in root height influence stress distribution under realistic service loading conditions. This study integrates finite element analysis (FEA) with experimentally validated GTAW weld profiles to evaluate the structural influence of weld root height in 316L stainless-steel pipe joints. An experimentally manufactured 4 in schedule 10S joint with a measured root height of less than 1.5 mm was adopted as the baseline geometry. Additional models with reinforcement heights of 1.138, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 mm were evaluated under two representative load cases: (i) internal pressure combined with drag and axial thrust (LC-1), and (ii) internal pressure with thrust only (LC-2). The results demonstrate that reinforcement heights exceeding 2.0 mm increase von Mises, hoop, longitudinal, and radial stress gradients, with peak stresses shifting toward the weld toe under drag-inclusive loading. In contrast, reinforcement ≤2 mm provides smoother load transfer and reduced stiffness discontinuity across the weld interface. The combined numerical and experimental findings support a stress-informed upper limit of 2 mm for weld root reinforcement in thin-walled stainless-steel pipelines, offering a performance-based complement to existing dimensional acceptance criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.