ArticleMicroorganisms2026
Dairy Sites with Milk Exposure Are Most Likely to Have Detection of Influenza A Virus.
Article in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- A longitudinal study of influenza A viral detection in bulk tank and pen-level milk collected from dairy farms in California affected by highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1.Journal of dairy science · 2026Article
- Surveillance on California dairy farms reveals multiple possible sources of H5N1 influenza virus transmission.PLoS biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus of the H5N1 subtype has been infecting U.S. dairy cattle and spreading among dairy operations since March 2024. H5N1 surveillance systems for dairies are needed, but information on whether environmental sampling can inform these systems is lacking. To guide a surveillance framework, we determined the environmental sites with Influenza A virus (IAV) detection on H5N1-affected dairies (n = 25) in four states (California, Colorado, Michigan, and Ohio) and explored sample characteristics that may have influenced detection. A total of 581 samples from dairy environmental sites were characterized for IAV RNA via rRT-PCR, and classified into six categories. A total of 94 samples (16.2%) had IAV detected, and the Ct values measured from these samples were typically higher than those measured in bulk tank milk from a subset of sampled herds. A majority of IAV detections were made from the following site categories: milking equipment/personal protective equipment, parlor surfaces, and wastewater/lagoons/manure. These results suggest that environmental sites most likely to be contaminated with IAV on dairies are those with exposure to milk. Meanwhile, mixed effect logistic modeling showed that days into an outbreak that samples were collected was associated with IAV detection. These results provide a framework within which to continue the assessment of environmental sampling as a surveillance tool for dairy H5N1. This framework can be strengthened by studies that perform further IAV viral characterization and collect samples from sites prior to, during, and after H5N1 outbreak periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.