ArticleMicroorganisms2026
In Vitro Degradation of Chlorpyrifos by the Ruminal Microbes: Insights from the Rumen Metagenome.
Article in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vitro studies were conducted in a series to investigate if the ruminal microbes are capable of degrading chlorpyrifos. This in vitro study presents the results from three experiments: Exp. I was conducted without feed, while Exp II and III were conducted with feed, either with or without methanol for dissolving chlorpyrifos, respectively. A basal diet comprising finger millet straw and concentrate was prepared. Incubation medium with feed but without chlorpyrifos served as the control. A total of six replicates each of control and chlorpyrifos spiked were used for the incubation. The pesticide concentration in the incubation medium before and after 24 h of incubation was analyzed using GC-MS/MS. The genomic DNA was isolated from the incubation fluid of the individual samples, and the shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed. The clean reads were taxonomically classified using the Kraken2 database, and microbial classification at different taxonomic ranks was separated using Pavian v1.0. The microbial genes in the metagenome data were predicted and assigned functional roles using the MetaErg v1.2.3 pipeline. The assigned KEGG Orthology (KO), EC numbers (Enzyme Commission number), Gene Ontology (GO), and corresponding NCBI taxonomy information relevant to chlorpyrifos metabolism/degradation were retrieved. Results from the study revealed that the chlorpyrifos concentration was decreased from 5.78 to 1.64 ppm over 24 h of in vitro incubation with feed. Similar alpha and beta diversity indices between control and chlorpyrifos treatments revealed that the richness and the evenness of the microbial population were not affected by the presence of chlorpyrifos in the rumen fluid. There was no difference in the microbiota affiliated to the major phyla such as Bacteroidota, Fibrobacterota, Bacillota, and Pseudomonadota. The EC 3.1.8.1, EC 3.1.3.1, EC 1.14.13.-, and EC 1.1.1.- reported for chlorpyrifos degradation were not detected in the metagenome, and only EC 3.1.1.1 was identified, which demonstrated that degradation of chlorpyrifos was carried out by the affiliated enzyme carboxylesterase. The presence of GO:0004035, GO:0004364, GO:0019637, GO:0016791, and GO:0042178 in the metagenome strengthens that the chlorpyrifos degradation in the present study was primarily assigned to the rumen microbiota. This in vitro study provided insights into the rumen microbiota involved in the chlorpyrifos degradation and the initial clue that the rumen microbes are capable of degrading chlorpyrifos. Further, the animal studies in different species with the variable levels of chlorpyrifos are also warranted to confirm the efficacy of rumen microbes in mixed syntrophy and determine the threshold capabilities of the ruminal microbes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.