ArticleMicromachines2026
Dragonfly-Wing-Inspired Bluff-Body Piezoelectric Harvester for Efficient Low-Wind-Speed Energy Harvesting.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inspired by the wing-opening morphology of dragonflies, a series of bio-inspired dragonfly-shaped bluff bodies are designed and investigated, and further integrated into a piezoelectric wind energy harvester. The energy-harvesting performance and aerodynamic responses of bluff-body configurations with different wing-opening angles (0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60°) are comparatively analyzed through a combination of numerical simulations and wind tunnel experiments. Experimental results demonstrate pronounced differences among the configurations in the low wind speed regime. Specifically, the prototype with α = 0° achieves relatively higher output under very low wind speeds, whereas the α = 15° configuration exhibits the best overall performance across the entire tested wind speed range. Taking the α = 15° case as an example, the cut-in wind speed is reduced to 1.7 m/s, while the maximum RMS voltage and output power are increased by 20.16% and 44.39% compared with the cuboid bluff body, and by 50.95% and 127.84% compared with the cylinder bluff body, respectively. Further CFD results reveal that, at specific wing-opening angles, the dragonfly-shaped bluff body undergoes a coupled vortex-induced vibration (VIV) and galloping response, enabling certain configurations to sustain stable oscillations with large amplitudes over a relatively wide wind speed range. Within the investigated parameter range, an appropriate selection of the wing-opening angle effectively balances the cut-in capability and output stability under low wind speed conditions. These findings provide useful design guidelines for flow-induced vibration-based wind energy harvesters operating in low wind speed environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.