ArticleMicromachines2026
Tantalum Interconnect Metallization for Thin-Film Neural Interface Devices.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural interfaces created using thin-film fabrication rely primarily on conductive metal traces for electrical interconnects. Here, we explore the use of tantalum (Ta) metal interconnects as a replacement for noble-metal interconnects such as Au, Pt or Ir. Ta has been investigated previously for interconnect metallization in flexible silicon ribbon cables, but the structure and properties of tantalum for neural device metallization have not been extensively reported. In the present work, Ta metal was sputter-deposited onto amorphous silicon carbide (a-SiC), with and without a base titanium (Ti) adhesion layer, and investigated as interconnect metallization. In the absence of a Ti adhesion layer, resistivity measurements revealed a factor of six difference between Ta resistivity depending on the presence of the Ti base layer, with direct deposition on a-SiC nucleating high resistivity β-Ta (ρ = 197 ± 31 µΩ·cm, mean ± standard deviation) and Ta deposited on Ti nucleating low resistivity α-Ta (ρ = 35 ± 6 µΩ·cm). X-ray diffraction confirmed the existence of the two crystal structures. Ta feature sizes of 2 µm were created using photolithography and reactive ion etching (RIE). Finally, planar microelectrode array test structures using α-Ta and Au trace metallization with low-impedance ruthenium oxide (RuO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.