ArticleMicromachines2026
Effects of In Situ Preheating Technology on Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of FFF-Printed PEEK.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) suffers from insufficient interlayer molecular chain diffusion and weak interfacial fusion during Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) due to its high melt viscosity and rapid cooling characteristics, restricting the mechanical properties and engineering applications of printed parts. To improve the interlayer bonding quality of FFF-printed PEEK, an in situ preheating technology integrated into the print nozzle was proposed and implemented. Through a high-temperature controllable preheating system that moves synchronously with the nozzle, local precise heating is performed on the surface of the deposited layer to actively regulate the thermal history of the interlayer interface. Systematic studies on the effect of preheating temperature were conducted. The results show that the influence of preheating temperature on part performance follows a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. When the preheating temperature is 280 °C, the comprehensive performance of the specimens is optimal: the tensile strength reaches 69.47 MPa, which is 21.3% higher than that of the non-preheated reference group; the elongation at break is 71.07%; and the porosity decreases to 8.36%. Microstructural analysis reveals that moderate preheating facilitates molecular chain diffusion and interfacial fusion, whereas excessive heating induces thermal oxidative degradation of PEEK, resulting in deteriorated mechanical performance. These findings confirm that in situ preheating represents an effective approach for enhancing interlayer bonding, thereby offering a practical solution for the additive manufacturing of high-performance PEEK components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.