ArticleMicromachines2026
A Physics-Informed Hybrid Neural Network for High-Precision Temperature Prediction in Semiconductor Process Equipment.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-precision thermal regulation in semiconductor process equipment is critical for product quality, yet it is challenged by actuator transport delays, limited actuator bandwidth due to hardware dynamics, and broadband inlet disturbances in temperature-controlled process fluids. This paper presents a systematic solution integrating architecture optimization with a physics-informed hybrid prediction model to enable effective feedforward compensation. Frequency-domain analysis justifies placing the temperature fluctuation attenuator (TFA) upstream of the heater to filter mid-to-high-frequency disturbances without compromising feedback stability. To address actuation delays, a Physics-CNN-LSTM predictor is developed using a residual learning strategy. This framework employs a mechanism model for baseline estimation and a deep learning network to correct persistent low-frequency residuals caused by unmodeled dynamics. Comparative experiments on industrial data demonstrate that the model achieves a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 3.56×10-5 K under low-to-mid-frequency inlet disturbances, reducing error by approximately 51.8% compared to a standard LSTM. The model also exhibits strong robustness against disturbance frequency shifts (R2>0.996 on unseen data). Furthermore, closed-loop simulations confirm that the proposed feedforward compensation enhances temperature stability in high-precision thermal control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.