ReviewMicromachines2026
Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Materials, Processes, and Emerging Applications.
Review in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional printing as a transformative platform for patient-centric pediatric drug delivery: technologies, formulation strategies and clinical translation.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026Review
- Biopolymer-Based 3D Printing for Dental-Pulp Complex Tissue Regeneration: Innovations and Challenges.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Promise of 3D Biomaterial Bioprinting for Wound-Healing and Skin Tissue Restoration.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Modeling of Biomechanical and Functional Parameters of Hydrogel-Cell Composites Fabricated by 3D Bioprinting Using AI-Supported Approach.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Feasible Regions of Nozzle Temperature, Extrusion Pressure, and Printing Speed in Extrusion-Based Printing Using a Sodium Alginate-Carboxymethylcellulose-Collagen I Bioink.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Collagen-Based Microspheres for Biomedical Applications in Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Corrosion Behavior and Ion Release of Co-Cr Dental Alloys Fabricated by Casting, CAD/CAM, SLM and DMLS: Influence of Manufacturing Route and Microstructure.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has rapidly emerged as a transformative technology at the interface of biomedical engineering and regenerative medicine. By enabling the spatially controlled deposition of living cells, biomaterials, and bioactive molecules, it offers an unprecedented potential to fabricate functional tissues and potentially whole organs in the future. This review explores recent advances in bioprinting materials, processes, and applications, emphasizing the integration of bioinks, printing methods, and mechanical design principles that underpin tissue functionality. Natural and synthetic biomaterials such as hydrogels (e.g., collagen, alginate), polyethylene glycol (PEG), and polyesters like PLGA are evaluated in terms of biocompatibility, printability, and degradation behavior. Key bioprinting modalities, including extrusion, inkjet, and laser-assisted bioprinting, are compared based on printing resolution, cell viability, and scalability. Structural considerations such as scaffold architecture, mechanical stability, and biomimetic design are discussed in relation to native tissue mechanics and requirements. The review also surveys emerging applications in tissue engineering (e.g., bone, cartilage, skin replacements), organ-on-a-chip systems for drug testing, and patient-specific implants, while addressing persistent challenges such as standardization of biofabrication, regulatory and ethical considerations, and manufacturing scale-up. Finally, future trends, including the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic automation, multi-material and four-dimensional (4D) bioprinting, and the maturation of personalized bioprinting strategies, are highlighted as pathways toward more autonomous and clinically relevant bioprinting systems. Collectively, these developments signify a paradigm shift in how biological constructs are designed and manufactured, bridging the gap between laboratory research and clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.