Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41900165›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2026

Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Materials, Processes, and Emerging Applications.

Subin Antony Jose, Antonia Evtimow, Pradeep L Menezes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Subin Antony JoseDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Antonia EvtimowDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Pradeep L MenezesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8030-8504

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has rapidly emerged as a transformative technology at the interface of biomedical engineering and regenerative medicine. By enabling the spatially controlled deposition of living cells, biomaterials, and bioactive molecules, it offers an unprecedented potential to fabricate functional tissues and potentially whole organs in the future. This review explores recent advances in bioprinting materials, processes, and applications, emphasizing the integration of bioinks, printing methods, and mechanical design principles that underpin tissue functionality. Natural and synthetic biomaterials such as hydrogels (e.g., collagen, alginate), polyethylene glycol (PEG), and polyesters like PLGA are evaluated in terms of biocompatibility, printability, and degradation behavior. Key bioprinting modalities, including extrusion, inkjet, and laser-assisted bioprinting, are compared based on printing resolution, cell viability, and scalability. Structural considerations such as scaffold architecture, mechanical stability, and biomimetic design are discussed in relation to native tissue mechanics and requirements. The review also surveys emerging applications in tissue engineering (e.g., bone, cartilage, skin replacements), organ-on-a-chip systems for drug testing, and patient-specific implants, while addressing persistent challenges such as standardization of biofabrication, regulatory and ethical considerations, and manufacturing scale-up. Finally, future trends, including the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic automation, multi-material and four-dimensional (4D) bioprinting, and the maturation of personalized bioprinting strategies, are highlighted as pathways toward more autonomous and clinically relevant bioprinting systems. Collectively, these developments signify a paradigm shift in how biological constructs are designed and manufactured, bridging the gap between laboratory research and clinical translation.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingbioinkshydrogel scaffoldsorgan-on-a-chiptissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID41900165
PMCPMC13028277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.