Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41900012›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Using Large-Scale Group Decision Making and Normal Cloud Model.

Lijie Wu, Changchun Liu, Hanwen Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lijie WuDepartment of Sino-German Engineer, Shanghai Technical Institute of Electronics and Information, Shanghai 201400, China.
Changchun LiuDepartment of Sino-German Engineer, Shanghai Technical Institute of Electronics and Information, Shanghai 201400, China.
Hanwen SongDepartment of Sino-German Engineer, Shanghai Technical Institute of Electronics and Information, Shanghai 201400, China.

Funding

Chenguang Program 20CGB15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is crucial for complex system reliability. However, traditional FMEA and its existing enhancements face significant limitations. These notably include difficulties in handling diverse heterogeneous data, effectively coordinating large expert groups, and robustly propagating inherent uncertainties. To bridge these critical gaps, this paper proposes an innovative and robust FMEA framework, specifically designed for Large Group Decision Making (LGDM) under uncertainty, leveraging the Normal Cloud Model (NCM). First, LGDM is genuinely integrated into FMEA by involving an unprecedented number of experts (>50). Second, a broad spectrum of heterogeneous data, including exact numbers, interval numbers, NCMs, linguistic terms, and linguistic expressions, is utilized to effectively model and manage diverse uncertainties. Third, a four-step data preprocessing method is incorporated to efficiently screen invalid and low-quality inputs, significantly enhancing the reliability of aggregated results. Fourth, an innovative and comprehensive expert weight determination method that judiciously combines subjective factors with objective data quality is proposed, ensuring more trustworthy and equitable aggregation of judgments. Distinctively, our method explicitly preserves and propagates uncertainty information across the entire computational process, yielding more insightful and informative results beyond simple rankings, encompassing detailed quantitative uncertainty analysis. A practical case study, alongside detailed result analysis, sensitivity analysis, both qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis, and advantages and limitations analysis, collectively confirms the effectiveness, practicality, rationality, and robustness of the proposed method. The sensitivity analyses demonstrate that the final risk rankings are highly stable even under varying trade-off coefficients, confirming the method's strong robustness and insensitivity to parameter fluctuations. Our framework provides a scientifically advanced and robust approach for FMEA in complex decision-making environments, particularly applicable to high-stakes industries such as modern aviation, thereby enabling more informed risk management decisions.

Indexed as

comprehensive weightfailure modes and effects analysisheterogeneous datalarge-scale group decision makingnormal cloud models

Identifiers

PMID41900012
PMCPMC13026005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.