Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41899985›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Control over Recommendation Algorithms in Heterogeneous Modular Systems with Dynamic Opinions.

Vladislav Gezha, Ivan Kozitsin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vladislav GezhaLaboratory of Active Systems, V. A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Ivan KozitsinLaboratory of Active Systems, V. A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2638-0131

Funding

Russian Science Foundation project no. 936 24-71-00070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paper suggests a model-dependent theoretical framework for designing optimal ranking algorithms to achieve desirable macroscopic opinion configurations. We consider an opinion formation process in which agents communicate through stochastic pairwise interactions, with the outcomes of these interactions being a function of the interacting agents' opinions and individual attributes (types). For the model, we write a mean-field approximation (MFA)-a coarse-grained nonlinear ordinary differential equation-which accommodates network modularity and assortativity, agents' activity heterogeneity, and the curation of a ranking system that can prohibit interactions with opinion- and type-dependent probabilities. Upon MFA, we formulate a control problem for dynamically adjusting the ranking algorithm's parameters. The existence of a solution is proved, and certain properties of optimal controllers are derived. For the case of a two-element opinion alphabet, we obtain a solution to the control problem using finite-difference schemes. This solution holds for any number of agent types and does not depend on external factors, such as the influence of social bots. Numerical tests corroborate our findings and also enable us to investigate the control problem for high-dimension opinion spaces, wherein we consider two primary scenarios: depolarization of an initially polarized society and nudging a social system towards a fixed endpoint of an opinion spectrum.

Indexed as

finite-difference schemesmean-field approximationmodular networksopinion dynamicsoptimal controlranking algorithms

Identifiers

PMID41899985
PMCPMC13025129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.