Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41899962›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Entropy-Based Dual-Teacher Distillation for Efficient Motor Imagery EEG Classification.

Zefeng Xu, Zhuliang Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zefeng XuSchool of Automation Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3558-2456
Zhuliang YuSchool of Automation Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China.

Funding

The Technology Innovation 2030 2022ZD0211700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor imagery (MI) EEG classification is a key component of noninvasive brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) and often must satisfy strict latency constraints in online or edge deployments. Although ensembling can reliably improve MI decoding accuracy, its inference cost grows linearly with the number of ensemble members, making it impractical for low-latency applications. To address these issues, we propose an entropy-based dual-teacher distillation framework that transfers ensemble teacher knowledge to a single deployable backbone. From an information theoretic perspective, two failure modes are common in small and noisy MI datasets: elevated predictive entropy (noisy decisions) and large fluctuation across late training epochs (unstable convergence and unreliable checkpoint selection). Thus, we introduce an exponential moving average (EMA) teacher with entropy-gated activation as a low-pass filter in parameter space to reduce the student's prediction noise. In addition, a two-stage cosine annealing schedule is employed to suppress late-stage oscillations and improve the robustness of final checkpoint selection. Experiments on two public MI benchmarks (BCI Competition IV-2a and IV-2b) with three representative backbones (EEGNet, ShallowConvNet, and ATCNet) under the subject dependent protocol show consistent accuracy gains over the ensemble teacher and strong distillation baselines. On IV-2a, our method achieves an average accuracy of 0.7713 across the backbones, surpassing both the original models (0.7222) and the corresponding ensembles (0.7482); on IV-2b, it achieves 0.8583 versus 0.8432 (original) and 0.8529 (ensemble).

Indexed as

brain–computer interface (BCI)EMA teacherensemble learningknowledge distillationmotor imagery (MI)predictive entropy

Identifiers

PMID41899962
PMCPMC13026056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.