ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Robust Cell-Level Classification for Liquid-Based Cervical Cytology Using Deep Transfer Learning: A Multi-Source Study Addressing Scanner-Induced Domain Shifts.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated analysis of liquid-based cervical cytology is increasingly supported by digital microscopy and deep learning. However, model generalization remains challenging due to scanner- and laboratory-induced domain shifts affecting color, texture, and morphology. In this study, we present a robust cell-level classification framework for liquid-based Pap smear cytology based on deep transfer learning, designed to operate under heterogeneous acquisition conditions. We construct a multi-source dataset by integrating three widely used public reference repositories (SIPaKMeD, Herlev, CRIC Cervix) with a proprietary cohort comprising 416 Whole Slide Images (WSIs) collected from two medical centers and digitized using different scanning systems. All labels are harmonized into four Bethesda categories (NILM, ASC-US, LSIL, HSIL), and cell-centered 224 × 224 patches are used as standardized inputs for model development and benchmarking. We evaluate state-of-the-art CNN backbones (ResNet50, EfficientNetB0, VGG16) and perform systematic ablation across data-source combinations to quantify robustness under acquisition variability. Among the evaluated models, ResNet50 yields the best overall performance on the independent test set (accuracy = 0.91; macro-F1 = 0.91), consistently outperforming EfficientNetB0 and VGG16. Importantly, incorporating proprietary multi-center WSI-derived data improves robustness to scanner-induced variation compared to training on public data alone. These findings demonstrate that combining diverse data sources can mitigate domain shift in cell-level cervical cytology classification. While clinically actionable screening requires slide-level aggregation (e.g., MIL-based WSI inference), the proposed classifier provides a robust component that can be integrated into end-to-end WSI screening pipelines in future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.