ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Measuring Assistive Technology Outcomes via AI-Based Kinematic Modeling of Individualized Routine Learning in Elite Boccia Athletes with Severe Cerebral Palsy: A Longitudinal Case Series.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis longitudinal single-case series evaluated an AI-based routine-learning system as assistive technology (AT) for elite Boccia athletes with severe Cerebral Palsy (CP). The study aimed to provide an innovative outcome measurement approach for individualized monitoring by integrating performance scores and longitudinal kinematic variability indicators.
methodsThree national-level players performed 694 throws over eight weeks. To ensure technical credibility, trials were rated through a consensus-based assessment by a panel of two experts, serving as ground truth for AI modeling. The system utilized a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) architecture to extract 29 kinematic features and perform regression-based scoring, providing real-time augmented feedback.
resultsHigh-baseline tasks maintained stable scores (7-9), while intermediate tasks showed significant score increases, reflecting motor learning transitions. The model achieved a Mean Squared Error of 1.14 and a Mean Absolute Error of 1.13, demonstrating high alignment with expert standards. Training demonstrated stable convergence, with loss reducing from 7.45 to 1.19. Notably, for the most severely impaired athlete, the AI system detected a 4.69% reduction in kinematic variability despite stagnant performance scores. This provides empirical evidence of movement stabilization within the cognitive stage that traditional observation might overlook.
conclusionsThe Bi-LSTM system enabled accurate tracking of performance and motor variability, revealing distinct learning curves based on task difficulty. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of AI-enabled motion analysis as an AT for outcome measurement, supporting data-driven coaching where conventional evaluation is constrained by the rarity and severity of disabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.