ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Automated Metrics for the Diagnosis of Instability Between the 2nd and 7th Cervical Vertebrae.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosing cervical spine instability with flexion-extension radiographs is challenging, as current guidelines are based on limited cadaver studies and do not adequately account for level, vertebral size, or patient effort. There is a need for automated cervical instability metrics anchored to normative reference data, accompanied by evidence on how often abnormal findings occur in real clinical populations and which soft-tissue injury patterns they can detect. We developed and evaluated fully automated, radiographic-based cervical intervertebral motion (IVM) metrics-adapted from prior lumbar methods-using an FDA-cleared analysis pipeline that segments C2-C7 and derives rotation, translation, disc heights, and regression-based instability indices. Normative reference data were first established from flexion-extension radiographs of 341 asymptomatic volunteers after excluding radiographically degenerated levels. Abnormality prevalence was then estimated in two symptomatic cohorts: pooled preoperative clinical-trial radiographs and 881 patients with symptoms attributed to motor-vehicle accidents, excluding levels with <5° rotation to reduce unreliable data due to insufficiently stressed spines. Finally, potential diagnostic performance was assessed in a controlled cadaveric ligament-sectioning model (12 cadavers) using ROC analysis and Youden's J thresholds. Across clinical cohorts, objective IVM abnormalities were uncommon. Prevalence increased when studies demonstrated adequate total C2-C7 motion, emphasizing the importance of patient effort. In cadavers, vertical instability metrics were most discriminative (AUC 0.96-0.97) with high sensitivity (0.89) and perfect specificity at optimal thresholds, whereas translation changed minimally with sectioning. These results support regression-based instability indices as promising candidates for standardized, physiology-guided cervical instability assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.