Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41899740›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Unfiltered Access, Unseen Harms: A Developmental and Public Health Critique of Digital Rights Discourse.

Danielle A Einstein, Samantha Marsh, Michoel L Moshel, Talia Sinani, Tracy Burrell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danielle A EinsteinSchool of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8038-6094
Samantha MarshDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8129-0350
Michoel L MoshelSchool of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2764-6349
Talia SinaniSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-5782-1876
Tracy BurrellClinical Psychology Private Practice, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article maps and prioritises the foundational developmental needs of children and adolescents: social development, cognitive growth, emotional regulation, identity formation, and moral reasoning. Early and excessive digital engagement is then examined for its potential to impact these milestones, with consequences that reverberate through wellbeing, relationships, and lifelong resilience. Arguments which frame digital engagement as an individual right with potential benefits, downplay developmental risks. Drawing on developmental rights and agency frameworks, the current review disputes the prevailing assumption that digital participation should take precedence over healthy developmental trajectories. Instead, the debate is reframed around children's evolving capacities. It is proposed that digital entitlements are nested within age-appropriate limits and supports. Protecting the best interests of the child requires recognising the risk of addictive technology use. The rights of the child must also ensure cultivation of emotional competence and self-reliance. Overemphasis on digital expression risks elevating performative self-presentation before moral reasoning, critical thinking, and offline social skills have matured, particularly within environments shaped by algorithmic amplification, transient relationships, peer harassment, and the desire for validation. To address these risks, we advocate for a multi-layered public health response: consistent, developmentally attuned messaging; empowered parents and educators; whole-school strategies; and policy reforms that prioritise safety, accountability, and developmental alignment. By situating digital engagement within a developmental framework, this article proposes key principles on which to base the discussion of safeguarding youth wellbeing in the digital era.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentHuman RightsPublic HealthAdolescentChildDigital MediaDigital TechnologyHumansadolescentschild developmentdevelopmental psychologydigital mediadigital rightspublic healthscreen usesocial mediatolerance of uncertainty

Identifiers

PMID41899740
PMCPMC13026557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.