Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41899734›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Professional Pride During COVID-19 in a Cohort of Healthcare Workers.

Tanis Zadunayski, Anil Adisesh, France Labrèche, Shannon M Ruzycki, Nicola Cherry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tanis ZadunayskiDivision of Preventive Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3564-8478
Anil AdiseshDivision of Occupational Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3H2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4973-8474
France LabrècheResearch Department, Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail, Montreal, QC H3A 3C2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8722-0433
Shannon M RuzyckiDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8122-2910
Nicola CherryDivision of Preventive Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3147-1548

Funding

Canadian Immunology Task Force N/ACIHR 173209College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to identify circumstances associated with feelings of pride in healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A prospective cohort of Canadian HCWs reported pride-reinforcing events in April 2020 (Phase 1). In spring/summer 2022 (Phase 4), they completed a self-reported retrospective comparison rating of whether they 'now feel more [professional] pride than before the pandemic'. Among 4964 HCWs, 4360 (88%) described pride-reinforcing events in Phase 1; 3926 (79%) rated feeling more professional pride than before the pandemic in Phase 4. Teamwork (34%) and public appreciation (13%) were most cited in Phase 1. At Phase 4, male and older HCWs and community-based staff reported feeling more pride. Working as a physician, in hospital, with COVID-19 patients, and early anxiety/depression were associated with lower pride. Higher ratings were associated with greater organizational support. Many HCWs reported feeling more professional pride than before the pandemic. External support may help mitigate negative feelings.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelAdultCanadaFrontline WorkersHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2cohort studiesCOVID-19healthcare workersmental healthpersonal protective equipmentprofessional pride

Identifiers

PMID41899734
PMCPMC13027184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.