SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
A Review of Biomonitoring for Atrazine and Atrazine Metabolites Using Blood, Urine, and Sweat-Based Assays.
Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In current clinical medicine, urinary profiling and blood tests are the primary toxicological exposure assessments for endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), including atrazine. Recent research suggests that analog monitoring of EDC concentrations and metabolites in sweat may be a less invasive, yet equally reliable method for conducting toxicological exposure assessments. However, no systematic reviews have identified whether concentrations of atrazine in sweat serve as a valid biomarker of environmental exposure. Thus, we performed a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature to assess (1) if there is a correlation between the concentration of atrazine present in blood and urine and evaluate the evidence for sweat-based biomonitoring and (2) whether atrazine concentrations in sweat are a reliable and valid measurement of atrazine exposure based on the current state of evidence in the peer-reviewed literature. Databases included PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO Global Index Medicus. Stratified by exposure context, the average blood concentration of atrazine and atrazine metabolites in acute poisoning patients was 261 ng/mL, and the average blood concentration in prenatal exposure contexts was 31.68 ng/mL maximum in the included studies. While physicochemical properties of atrazine metabolites, particularly deisopropylatrazine (DIA), suggest potential suitability for sweat-based monitoring, empirical validation through controlled sweat collection studies is required before this approach can be recommended for clinical or occupational use. The results of the systematic review were heterogeneous, and a narrative review was conducted. To conclude, no studies have examined the concentration of atrazine in sweat and whether sweat can be used as a statistically valid toxicological assessment of atrazine exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.