ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Mapping Caregiver Needs' Assessment Tools for Family and Friend Caregivers: A Rapid Scoping Review.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFamily and friend caregivers provide essential support across health and social care systems but remain inconsistently identified, assessed, and supported in routine practice. Although numerous caregiver needs' assessment instruments exist, many focus on burden, distress, or preparedness rather than explicitly eliciting caregiver-defined support needs, limiting their utility for care planning, care transitions, and system integration.
methodsWe conducted a rapid scoping review to identify and characterize caregiver needs' assessment tools developed for family and friend caregivers. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies described the development, validation, or implementation of instruments designed to assess caregiver needs. Data were extracted on tool characteristics, domains assessed, administration methods, and implementation-relevant features. Item-level content analysis distinguished caregiver-defined support needs from related constructs, including burden, strain, preparedness, and care-recipient monitoring.
resultsForty-three studies describing caregiver needs' assessment instruments were included (19 instruments; 17 instrument families). Tools varied widely in length, administration, and conceptual framing. Seven domains of caregiver-defined support needs were identified: caregiver health and self-care; emotional and psychological support; information, communication, and navigation; practical and instrumental support; social and relational support; autonomy and life participation; and spiritual, cultural, and existential support. Information and navigation needs were most frequently assessed, while autonomy and spiritual domains were least consistently represented. Many instruments demonstrated construct drift, assessing stressors or impacts rather than explicitly eliciting caregiver-defined support needs. Few tools were designed for longitudinal reassessment, workflow integration, or documentation within electronic medical records.
conclusionsExisting caregiver needs' assessment tools inadequately support routine, system-integrated caregiver-centered care. Advancing caregiver-centered practice requires tools that explicitly elicit caregiver-defined support needs and are designed for workflow integration, longitudinal use, and interdisciplinary care pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.