Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41899674›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Studying Health Inequalities in Colombia: Diverse Perspectives on Their Causes and Next Steps for Action.

Lucinda Cash-Gibson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lucinda Cash-GibsonJHU-UPF Public Policy Center (JHU-UPF PPC), UPF-Barcelona School of Management (UPF-BSM), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08002 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3292-5684

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The historical and global study of health inequalities includes diverse philosophical, conceptual and methodological debates on their causes, how best to study them, and how and where to intervene. However, not all the perspectives in the field are widely recognized or known worldwide; for instance, Latin America's long-standing intellectual tradition on Social Medicine and Collective Health. Also, evidence suggests that not all countries have had the same socio-politics and institutional conditions to enable them to produce this type of research, and a few scholars have called for more in-depth understanding of the health inequalities research field in different global settings. This study aims to assess these issues in Colombia, where the Latin America Social Medicine and Collective Health tradition remains strong, yet the volume of scientific output has not been consistent over time. In total, 12 semi-structured interviews were conducted with key informants who have worked on health inequalities in Colombia over the past five decades to understand their perspectives on these issues and the national health inequalities research field. Data was triangulated with gray and scientific literature. The findings provide valuable context-specific empirical insights into the causes of health inequalities in Colombia, the main perspectives used to study them in the country, including the associated tensions around causality, as well as ideas on how to create meaningful change towards building a fairer society.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesColombiaHumansColombiahealth equityhealth inequalitieshistoryLatin Americapoliticsresearch productionsocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID41899674
PMCPMC13027137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.