Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41899665›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Cesarean Section Rates and Mobile Health's Role in Equitable Access to Prenatal Care.

Nicole Person-Rennell, Patrick Rivers, James Hollister, Alicia Dinsmore, Nicole Bratsch, Judith Ortiz, Kristen Rundell, Karen Lutrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicole Person-RennellDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85711, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-0787-3077
Patrick RiversDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85711, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5195-518X
James HollisterDepartment of Community, Environment, and Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4328-1071
Alicia DinsmoreDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85711, USA.
Nicole BratschDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85711, USA.
Judith OrtizDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85711, USA.
Kristen RundellDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85711, USA.
Karen LutrickDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85711, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3480-849X

Funding

Mobile Health Map/Mobile Healthcare Association NA- small private grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cesarean section (CS) rates have risen globally, and while an often lifesaving and necessary intervention, CS deliveries increase future maternal/neonatal risks and are costly to both patients and healthcare systems. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has set a national low-risk pregnancy CS (NTSV) target of 23.9% under the Healthy People 2030 initiative. This analysis compares NTSV rates of uninsured patients receiving prenatal care from a mobile clinic to the national target and also compares overall mobile health CS rates with national and state CS rates. Through reviewing 5 years of electronic medical records, we calculated an NTSV CS rate of 25.0% among our University of Arizona Mobile Health Program prenatal patients, an uninsured and medically vulnerable patient group. This rate is similar to both the most recent Arizona state average of 23.4% and the national target of 23.9%. The MHP total CS rate is 26% over our study period, which is less than the most recent National and Arizona rates of 32.3% and 29.0%. These findings suggest that access to free prenatal care through a mobile health delivery model may contribute to favorable obstetric outcomes among uninsured individuals and have implications for addressing maternal and neonatal health inequities among those who face multiple barriers to receiving adequate prenatal care.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionHealth Services AccessibilityMobile Health UnitsPrenatal CareAccess to Primary CareAdultArizonaFemaleHumansMedically UninsuredPregnancycesarian sectionsfree and charitable clinicsmobile clinicsmobile healthcareNTSVobstetric health indicatorsprenatal care

Identifiers

PMID41899665
PMCPMC13026476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.