ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Cesarean Section Rates and Mobile Health's Role in Equitable Access to Prenatal Care.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cesarean section (CS) rates have risen globally, and while an often lifesaving and necessary intervention, CS deliveries increase future maternal/neonatal risks and are costly to both patients and healthcare systems. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has set a national low-risk pregnancy CS (NTSV) target of 23.9% under the Healthy People 2030 initiative. This analysis compares NTSV rates of uninsured patients receiving prenatal care from a mobile clinic to the national target and also compares overall mobile health CS rates with national and state CS rates. Through reviewing 5 years of electronic medical records, we calculated an NTSV CS rate of 25.0% among our University of Arizona Mobile Health Program prenatal patients, an uninsured and medically vulnerable patient group. This rate is similar to both the most recent Arizona state average of 23.4% and the national target of 23.9%. The MHP total CS rate is 26% over our study period, which is less than the most recent National and Arizona rates of 32.3% and 29.0%. These findings suggest that access to free prenatal care through a mobile health delivery model may contribute to favorable obstetric outcomes among uninsured individuals and have implications for addressing maternal and neonatal health inequities among those who face multiple barriers to receiving adequate prenatal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.