ReviewCancers2026
Integrating Targeted Therapies into AML Frontline Therapy: Who Gets What and What Does the Future Hold?
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For decades, induction treatment of acute myeloid leukemia consisted of intensive chemotherapy for induction. High relapse rates and severe toxicity resulted in a five-year overall survival of ~30%. In patients ineligible for intensive treatment, hypomethylating agents (HMA) could be administered but generally failed to induce durable remissions. These limitations have driven the development of targeted drugs and less toxic therapeutic regimens. In the past decade, fourteen new agents have gained FDA and/or EMA approval, including small-molecule inhibitors targeting FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, BCL-2, menin, and the hedgehog pathway, as well as a CD33-directed antibody-drug conjugate. The combination of targeted drugs with intensive chemotherapy or HMA has resulted in improved remission rates and prolonged survival in certain patient subpopulations. However, many promising combinations are currently being evaluated in randomized trials and are not yet available in clinical routine. A combination that has become standard of care is HMA plus venetoclax for patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy, achieving high remission rates with relatively manageable toxicity. Moreover, targeted drugs directed against FLT3 and IDH1 have been approved in combination with intensive chemotherapy and HMA, respectively. Clinical decision-making requires rapid molecular diagnostic testing, assessment of a patient's fitness for intensive chemotherapy, and management of toxicities and drug interactions. This narrative review, illustrated with patient vignettes, summarizes currently available therapies, guides through the latest trials on frontline combinations in AML, and provides a preview of how the therapeutic landscape may evolve in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.