Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41899634›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Integrating Targeted Therapies into AML Frontline Therapy: Who Gets What and What Does the Future Hold?

Johanna Schreiber, Georg Hopfinger, Karoline V Gleixner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johanna SchreiberDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Klinik Favoriten, 1100 Vienna, Austria.
Georg HopfingerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Klinik Favoriten, 1100 Vienna, Austria.
Karoline V GleixnerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, induction treatment of acute myeloid leukemia consisted of intensive chemotherapy for induction. High relapse rates and severe toxicity resulted in a five-year overall survival of ~30%. In patients ineligible for intensive treatment, hypomethylating agents (HMA) could be administered but generally failed to induce durable remissions. These limitations have driven the development of targeted drugs and less toxic therapeutic regimens. In the past decade, fourteen new agents have gained FDA and/or EMA approval, including small-molecule inhibitors targeting FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, BCL-2, menin, and the hedgehog pathway, as well as a CD33-directed antibody-drug conjugate. The combination of targeted drugs with intensive chemotherapy or HMA has resulted in improved remission rates and prolonged survival in certain patient subpopulations. However, many promising combinations are currently being evaluated in randomized trials and are not yet available in clinical routine. A combination that has become standard of care is HMA plus venetoclax for patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy, achieving high remission rates with relatively manageable toxicity. Moreover, targeted drugs directed against FLT3 and IDH1 have been approved in combination with intensive chemotherapy and HMA, respectively. Clinical decision-making requires rapid molecular diagnostic testing, assessment of a patient's fitness for intensive chemotherapy, and management of toxicities and drug interactions. This narrative review, illustrated with patient vignettes, summarizes currently available therapies, guides through the latest trials on frontline combinations in AML, and provides a preview of how the therapeutic landscape may evolve in the near future.

Indexed as

acute myeloid leukemiaFLT3frontline treatmentIDH1IDH2KMT2Amenin inhibitorsprecision medicinetargeted therapyvenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID41899634
PMCPMC13025187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.