ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2026
Hepatic Ectopic Pregnancy: A Diagnostic Challenge Highlighted by Multimodal Imaging.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEctopic pregnancy occurs in about 1-2% of all pregnancies, with 95% implanting in the fallopian tubes. Hepatic implantation is one of the rarest and most dangerous forms of abdominal ectopic pregnancy. Its diagnosis is often delayed because of nonspecific symptoms, and it is also often difficult for routine ultrasound imaging to visualize ectopic pregnancy sites that are not in the pelvis. Since this type of pregnancy carries a risk of severe hemorrhage, early identification is crucial. CASE: A 30-year-old woman, gravida 3 para 2, presented with a serum β-hCG of 66,408 mIU/mL, but no intrauterine pregnancy was detected on ultrasound imaging. At an outside facility, a laparoscopy was performed, which also failed to show a pelvic ectopic pregnancy. The patient then received her first dose of methotrexate and was subsequently transferred to a tertiary care center for further evaluation. MRI and liver ultrasound showed a 2.3 cm subcapsular lesion in segment 5 of the liver that was suspicious for a hepatic ectopic pregnancy. However, these imaging studies could not exclude a gestational trophoblastic disease or hepatic neoplasm. A dilation and curettage revealed no trophoblastic tissue. The patient next received two additional doses of methotrexate on hospital days 4 and 7 due to an inadequate decline in interval β-hCG; β-hCG levels declined gradually but steadily over several months until they became undetectable and indicated a successful medical treatment of her hepatic ectopic pregnancy.
conclusionsThis case highlights the complex diagnostic and treatment challenges presented by a hepatic ectopic pregnancy. Multimodal imaging, serial monitoring of β-hCG levels, and the engagement of a multidisciplinary team were essential factors in achieving a safe, nonsurgical, and successful resolution of this condition. When a pregnancy of unknown location is suspected, extended imaging studies are critical tools for patient evaluation after initial imaging studies and laparoscopy are inconclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.